|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]田水承,张成镇.安全工程领域脆弱性“玻璃心”模型构建[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(6):160-164.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.06.025]
 TIAN Shuicheng,ZHANG Chengzhen.Construction of vulnerability “Glass Heart” model in safety engineering[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(6):160-164.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.06.025]
点击复制

安全工程领域脆弱性“玻璃心”模型构建
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
14
期数:
2018年6期
页码:
160-164
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2018-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Construction of vulnerability “Glass Heart” model in safety engineering
文章编号:
1673-193X(2018)-06-0160-05
作者:
田水承12张成镇12
(1 西安科技大学 安全科学与工程学院,陕西 西安 710054;2 西安科技大学 教育部西部矿山开采及灾害治理重点实验室,陕西 西安 710054)
Author(s):
TIAN Shuicheng12 ZHANG Chengzhen12
(1. College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an Shaanxi 710054, China;2. Key Laboratory of Western Mine Exploitation and Hazard Prevention, Ministry of Education, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an Shaanxi 710054, China)
关键词:
安全工程脆弱性“玻璃心”模型指标体系指数公式
Keywords:
safety engineering vulnerability “Glass Heart” model index system index formula
分类号:
X913.4
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.06.025
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为将脆弱性理论更好地应用于安全工程学科,在脆弱性已有的三大特征要素基础上加入扰动度特征要素,提出脆弱性四特征要素(扰动度、暴露度、敏感度和适应度),建立脆弱性“玻璃心”模型及适用于该模型的指标体系和指数公式。研究结果表明:脆弱性四大特征要素间并非独立或递次关系,而是相互交叉影响;脆弱性“玻璃心”模型可以较好地表示各特征要素间的复杂关系,将该模型应用于煤矿火灾事故进行检验,建立煤矿火灾脆弱性指标体系,采用脆弱性指数公式计算煤矿火灾的脆弱性程度,能较为准确地反映出煤矿火灾脆弱性的真实状况。
Abstract:
In order to better apply the vulnerability theory in the safety engineering discipline, the characteristic element of disturbance degree was added into the existing three characteristic elements of vulnerability, and the four characteristic elements of vulnerability were put forward, including the disturbance degree, exposure degree, sensitivity and adaptation degree, then a vulnerability “Glass Heart” model and the corresponding index system and index formula being applicable to the model were established. The results showed that there was not the independent or sequence relationship among the four characteristic elements of vulnerability, while the interactive intersection influence. The vulnerability “Glass Heart” model could better represent the complex relationship among the various characteristic elements. The model was applied in the fire accident of coal mine to carry out the verification, and the vulnerability index system of coal mine fire was established, then the vulnerability index formula was used to calculate the vulnerability degree of coal mine fire. The results showed that the actual situation about the vulnerability of coal mine fire could be reflected more accurately.

参考文献/References:

[1]MARGAT J. Vulnerability of groundwater to pollution[R]. Orleans: France, 1968.
[2]KATES R W, CLARK W C, CORELL R, et al. Environment and development: sustainability science[J]. Science, 2001(292): 641-642.
[3]武强,张波,赵文德,等. 煤层底板突水评价的新型实用方法V: 基于GIS的ANN型、证据权型、Logistic回归型脆弱性指数法的比较[J]. 煤炭学报, 2013, 38(1): 21-26. WU Qiang, ZHANG Bo, ZHAO Wende, et al. A new practical methodology of coal seam floor water burst evaluation V: the comparison study among ANN, the weight of evidence and the logistic regression vulnerable index method based on GIS [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013, 38(1): 21-26.
[4]刘铁民. 事故灾难成因再认识: 脆弱性研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2010, 6(5): 5-10. LIU Tiemin.Recognition of disaster causes: study of the vulnerability[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2010, 6(5): 5-10.
[5]刘铁民,徐永莉,王浩. 重特大事故频发凸显生产安全的系统脆弱性:2013年几起特大事故反思[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2014, 10(4): 5-12.LIU Tiemin, XU Yongli, WANG Hao. The frequent serious accidents exposing the system vulnerability of work safety: Reflection on several serious accidents in 2013[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2014, 10(4): 5-12.
[6]许葭,宋守信,袁朋伟,等. 基于ANP的地铁站点网络脆弱性评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2015, 25(12): 129-134. XU Jia, SONG Shouxin, YUAN Pengwei, et al. Evaluation of network vulnerability of subway stations based on ANP[J], China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25(12): 129-134.
[7]宋守信,肖楚阳,翟怀远,等. 基于脆弱性理论的地铁电气火灾影响因子研究[J]. 西安科技大学学报,2016, 36(5): 691-696. SONG Shouxin, XIAO Chuyang, ZHAI Huaiyuan, et al. Influential factors for subway electrical fire based on vulnerability[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Thchnology, 2016, 36 (5): 691-696.
[8]宋守信,姚德志,肖楚阳. 基于多级可拓评价方法的大客流扰动下地铁脆弱性研究[J]. 城市轨道交通研究,2017(1): 25-31. SONG Shouxin, YAO Dezhi ,XIAO Chuyang. Research on subway vulnerability under large passenger flow disturbance based on multi-level extension evaluation method[J]. Research on Urban Rail Transit, 2017(1): 25-31.
[9]宋守信,徐葭,陈明利,等. 脆弱性特征要素递次演化分析与评价方法研究[J]. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2017, 16(2): 57-65. SONG Shouxin, XU Jia, CHEN Mingli, et al. The mechanism and evaluation of vulnerability factors progressive growth[J]. Journal of Beijing University (Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 16(2): 57-65.
[10]田水承,张成镇. 安全科学与工程视域下脆弱性研究评述[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2018, 38(1):8-16. TIAN Shuicheng, ZHANG Chengzhen. Overview of vulnerability based on safety science and engineering[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Thchnology, 2018, 38(1):8-16.
[11]SMIT B, WANDEL J. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16(3): 282-292.
[12]BROOKS N, ADGER W N, KELLY P M. The Determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2005, 15(2): 151-163.
[13]田水承,景国勋,安全管理学[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2016.
[14]张兴凯. 矿井火灾风险指数评价法[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2006, 6(4): 89-92. ZHANG Xingkai. Index method of mine fire risk assessment[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2006, 6(4): 89-92.
[15]陈盟. 煤矿火灾危险等级多层次模糊综合评价[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2014.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘铁民.事故灾难成因再认识——脆弱性研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(5):5.
 LIU Tie-min.Recognition of disaster causes—study of the vulnerability[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(6):5.
[2]张新梅,陈国明.安全工程专业本科毕业设计的全过程质量控制[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(1):112.
 ZHANG Xin-mei,CHEN Guo-ming.Whole process quality control of undergraduate graduation projection of safety engineering[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(6):112.
[3]张景钢,张桂英.安全工程特色专业建设研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(2):151.
 ZHANG Jing gang,ZHANG Gui ying.Research on construction of safety engineering characteristic specialty[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(6):151.
[4]刘铁民.火灾频发暴露我国城市公共安全系统脆弱性[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(3):5.
 LIU Tie-min.The frequent fire accidents exposed the vulnerability of urban public safety system[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(6):5.
[5]孙晓雷,杨英丽,牛金成.专业认证与安全工程本科教育[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(3):78.
 SUN Xiao-lei,YUANG Ying-li,NIU Jin-cheng.Study on professional accertification and safety engineering undergraduate education[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(6):78.
[6]张洪杰,向晓东,陈旺生.安全工程专业教学方法改革与创新型人才培养[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(6):172.
 ZHANG Hong-jie,XIANG Xiao-dong,CHEN Wang-sheng.Safety Engineering Teaching Methods Reform and Innovation Talents Training[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(6):172.
[7]魏连江,王德明,陈开岩.《矿井通风与安全》课程设计教学模式研究与改革[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):163.
 WEI Lian-jiang,WANG De-ming,CHEN Kai-yan.Teaching Research and Reform of Mine Ventilation and Safety Course Design[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(6):163.
[8]王桂芬,张宪立,阎卫东,等.建筑物火灾中人员行为EXODUS模拟的研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(8):67.
 WANG Gui-fen,ZHANG Xian-li,YAN Wei-dong.Building fire behavior modeling of EXODUS[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(6):67.
[9]侯海周,胡毅亭,卫延安.基于试验的工业雷管传输皮带殉爆距离的安全评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(9):93.
 HOU Hai-zhou,Hu Yi-ting,Wei Yan-an.Safety Assessment for Safety Distance of Propagation Blast of Transmission Belts of Industrial detonators Based on Experimental[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(6):93.
[10]刘鹏刚,杨振宏,杨宏刚,等.安全工程本科专业实习基地建设探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(9):186.
 Liu Peng-gang,Yang Zhen-hong,YangHong-gang,et al.The dilemma and solving ways of safety engineering practice base on large-scale engineering[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(6):186.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家科学自然基金项目(71273208,71271169);陕西省教育厅哲学社会科学重点研究基地项目(14JZ026)
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-07-05