|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陈伟,温晋锋,钱城江.化工企业事故决策者风险感知模拟预测研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(8):92-98.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.08.015]
 CHEN Wei,WEN Jinfeng,QIAN Chengjiang.Study on simulation and prediction of risk perception for enterprise decision-maker in chemical accident[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(8):92-98.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.08.015]
点击复制

化工企业事故决策者风险感知模拟预测研究
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
12
期数:
2016年8期
页码:
92-98
栏目:
现代职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2016-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on simulation and prediction of risk perception for enterprise decision-maker in chemical accident
作者:
陈伟温晋锋钱城江
(南京工业大学 安全科学与工程学院,江苏省城市与工业安全重 点实验室,江苏 南京 210009)
Author(s):
CHEN Wei WEN Jinfeng QIAN Chengjiang
(Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban and Industrial Safety, College of Safety Science and Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing Jiangsu 210009, China)
关键词:
化工事故决策者风险感知模拟预测
Keywords:
chemical accident decision-maker risk perception simulation and prediction
分类号:
X913.4
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.08.015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为研究化工园区突发事故情景下,企业决策者的风险感知变化情况,基于系统动 力学系统论、信息论、结构论、控制论、协同论等特点,探索风险感知变化的实际影响 因素体系,并结合vensim软件构建企业决策者的风险感知因果关系图和系统流图,定量 评判、预测、计算和修正各影响因素之间的逻辑关系,建立量化表达函数并模拟,以此 获得各状态变量间的变化情况。对比敏感度分析结果表明:风险感知、风险观念以及风 险行为决策影响因素的正负相关性各有不同,且相互影响。
Abstract:
To study and predict the change of risk perception for enterprise decision-maker under the situation of sudden accident in chemical industry park, the practical influence factor system for change of risk perception was explored based on the characteristics including system theory, information theory, structure theory, control theory and coordination theory of system dynamic, and the causality graph and system flow diagram of risk perception for enterprise decision-maker were constructed with vensim software. The logic relation among various influence factos were evaluated, predicted, calculated and corrected quantitatively, and the quantitative expression function was built and simulated, so as to obtain the change of various state variables. By comparing the analysis results of sensitivity, it showed that the influence factors including risk perception, risk perspective and risk behavior and decision have different positive and negative correlation, and they influence each other.

参考文献/References:

[1]陈清光. 化工园区生产安全免疫机理与模型及免疫力评估研究[D]. 广州:华南 理工大学, 2014.
[2]Khan S, Luo Y, Ahmad A. Analysing complex behaviour of hydrological systems through a system dynamics approach.[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2009, 24(12):1363-1372.
[3]孟博, 刘茂, 李清水,等. 风险感知理论模型及影响因子分析[J]. 中国安全科 学学报, 2010, 20(10):59-66. MENG Bo, LIU Mao, LI Qingshui, et al. Theoretical model for risk perception and its factor analysis[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2010, 20(10):59 -66.
[4]李乃文, 王春迪, 牛莉霞. 高危岗位矿工个体风险感知影响因素仿真研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2015(9):184-190. LI Naiwen, WANG Chundi, NIU Lixia. Simulation of factors affecting individual risk percption of the high-risk position miner[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2015(9):184-190.
[5]张磊. 舆情管理也要树立风险观念[N]. 学习时报, 2016-05-02(05).
[6]李启明, 申立银. 风险管理中的风险效应-行为决策模型及分析[J]. 系统工程 理论与实践, 2001, 21(10):1-8. LI Qiming, SHEN Liyin. Decision-making model incorporating risk behavior under project risk management[J]. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2001, 21(10):1-8.
[7]张广玉. 论风险型决策与决策者的类型[J]. 统计与决策, 2005(4X):50-53. ZHANG Guangyu. The theory of the risk type decision and policy makers [J]. Statistics and Decision, 2005(4X):50-53.
[8]陆文聪, 西爱琴. 农户农业生产的风险反应:以浙江为例的MOTAD模型分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2005(12):68-75. LUN Wencong, XI Aiqing. Risk response of agricultural production farmers: MOTAD models in Zhejiang as an example analysis[J]. Chinese Rural Economy,2005(12):68-75.
[9]汪和平, 钱省三. 基于信息的消化吸收决策风险分析[J]. 商业研究, 2006 (11):141-144. WANG Heping, QIAN Shengsan. Analysis on risk decision of information-based technology absorption. Commercial Research, 2006(11):141-144.
[10]王愚, 达庆利, 陈伟达. 基于模糊先验概率的期望效用模型[J]. 管理科学学 报, 2002, 5(3):30-34. WANG Yu, DA Qingli,CHEN Weida. Expected utility model based on fuzzy prior probability[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2002, 5(3):30-34.
[11]钱城江,张明广,陈胤廷,等. 化工企业安全生产责任保险保费计算方法研究[J] . 中国安全科学学报, 2014,24(5):150-156. QIAN Chengjiang , ZHANG Mingguang, CHEN Yingting,et al. A calculation method of work safety liability insurance premiums for chemical enterprises[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2014,24(5):150-156.
[12]张磊. 基于遗忘曲线的推荐算法研究[D]. 淮南:安徽理工大学, 2014.
[13]Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk[J]. Levines Working Paper Archive, 1979, 68(3):263-91.
[14]董俊花. 风险决策影响因素及其模型建构[D]. 兰州:西北师范大学, 2006.
[15]姜树元, 姜青舫. 定常风险偏好效用函数式及其参数确定问题[J]. 中国管理 科学, 2007, 15(1):16-20. JIANG Shuyuan JIANG Qingfang. The functional expressions of utility measured as constant risk preference and parameters determination[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2007, 15(1):16-20.

相似文献/References:

[1]王陈玉书,张园园,张巨伟,等.化工事故模糊系统FTA模型的研究与应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(2):117.
 WANG CHEN Yu shu,ZHANG Yuan yuan,ZHANG Ju wei,et al.Research and application on FTA model of chemical accident fuzzy system[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(8):117.
[2]魏利军,王向阳,罗艾民,等.基于贝叶斯网络的化工园区地震次生灾害情景分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(12):73.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.12.011]
 WEI Lijun,WANG Xiangyang,LUO Aimin,et al.Scenario analysis on secondary disasters of earthquake in chemical industry park based on Bayesian network[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(8):73.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.12.011]
[3]牛毅,樊运晓,高远.基于数据挖掘的化工生产事故致因主题抽取[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(10):165.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.10.026]
 NIU Yi,FAN Yunxiao,GAO Yuan.Topic extraction on causes of chemical production accidents based on data mining[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(8):165.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.10.026]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金项目(71001051);江苏省危险化学品本质安全与控制重 点实验室开放课题项目(HCSC201304)
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-08-30