|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]周立国,姚安林,曾跃辉,等.城镇燃气管道动火作业安全评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(1):61-64.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.01.011]
 ZHOU Liguo,YAO Anlin,ZENG Yuehui,et al.Research on risk assessment method of third-party construction damage for urban gas pipeline[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(1):61-64.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.01.011]
点击复制

城镇燃气管道动火作业安全评价
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
12
期数:
2016年1期
页码:
61-64
栏目:
现代职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2016-01-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on risk assessment method of third-party construction damage for urban gas pipeline
文章编号:
1673-193X(2016)-01-0061-04
作者:
周立国1姚安林12曾跃辉1汪龙1高旭1
(1. 西南石油大学 石油与天然气工程学院,四川 成都 610500;2. 油气消防四川省重点实验室,四川 成都 610500)
Author(s):
ZHOU Liguo1 YAO Anlin12 ZENG Yuehui1 WANG Long1 GAO Xu1
(1. College of Petroleum & Natural Gas Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu Sichuan 610500, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Fire Control of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Sichuan 610500, China)
关键词:
城镇燃气管道动火作业安全评价未确知测度变异系数法
Keywords:
urban gas pipeline third-party construction damage risk assessment G2 weighting method matter element extension
分类号:
X913.4
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.01.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
针对城镇燃气管道动火作业的高危险性,为保障生命财产安全,提出一种基于未确知测度的安全评价方法。首先,从动火施工作业的前、中、后3个阶段对整个作业过程进行安全分析,并基于作业的前阶段建立安全评价体系。然后,引入未确知测度模型,将因素的量化值与测度函数结合得出测度评价矩阵,采用变异系数法处理评价矩阵,确定各危害因素的客观权重。最后,根据测度评价矩阵与因素权重得出动火作业的安全等级,并对危害因素进行排序。实例结果表明:应用该方法能有效地确定出城镇燃气管道动火作业的安全等级,对于不安全的施工作业,可根据排序确定高危险因素,并采取措施降低其危险性,提高整个动火作业过程的安全性。
Abstract:
A semi-quantitative risk assessment method for urban gas pipeline was proposed in order to reduce the adverse effect of third-party construction damage. Firstly, the failure factors were determined based on the system of "man-machine-environment-management", the factor weights were determined by G2 weighting method, and the matter element model was introduced to analyze the failure probability. Secondly, the mathematical models of jet flame, flash fire and vapor cloud explosion were established to calculate the damage area and determine the grade of failure consequence. Finally, the risk level of third-party construction damage for urban gas pipeline was obtained according to the risk matrix in API 581. Example analysis showed that this method combines the advantages of qualitative evaluation and quantitative evaluation. It can analyze the risk more accurately and effectively to determine the risk level.

参考文献/References:

[1]何悟忠,宋巍,李博. 输油管道动火的安全管理[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2009,5(1):169-171. HE Wuzhong, SONG Wei, LI Bo. Safety management of oil pipeline hot work [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2009, 5(1): 169-171.
[2]王永利. 输油管道动火作业的安全管理[J]. 石油和化工设备,2011,13(9):62-63. WANG Yongli. Safety management of oil pipeline hot work [J]. Petro & Chemical Equipment, 2011, 13(9): 62-63.
[3]王平. 油管道动火施工及投产现场管理[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2013:1-5.
[4]高彦录. 油气管道及容器动火安全防护[J]. 油气田地面工程,2010,29(6):88-89. GAO Yanlu. Safety protection of oil and gas pipeline and vessel hot work [J]. Oil-Gas field Surface Engineering. 2010, 29(6): 88-89.
[5]王来忠. 石油工业动火安全防护方法研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2009,5(2):165-168. WANG Laizhong. Study on safety protection methods for hot work in petroleum industry [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2009, 5(2): 165-168.
[6]杨言海,李铎,李晓辉,等. 浅析苏里格气田天然气管线工业动火风险控制[J]. 石油化工安全环保技术,2012,28(3):38-42. YANG Yanhai, LI Duo, LI Xiaohui, et al. Brief analysis on the risk control in industrial ignition of natural gas pipeline at sulige gas field [J]. Petrochemical Safety and Enviromental Protection Technology, 2012, 28(3): 38-42.
[7]谭洪强,邓红卫,马浩鹏,等. 基于未确知测度理论的公路隧道水害危险性评价[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(4): 166-172. TAN Hongqiang, DENG Hongwei, MA Haopeng, et al. Risk assessment on highway tunnel flood based on uncertainty measurement theory [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2015, 11(4): 166-172.
[8]朱兴琳,方守恩,王俊骅. 基于未确知测度理论的高等级公路交通安全评价[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版),2010,38(7): 1012-1017. ZHU Xinglin, FANG Shouen, WANG Junhua. Traffic safety assessment of high-grade highway based on uncertainty measurement theory [J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science) ), 2010, 38(7): 1012-1017.
[9]宋生奎,张勇,陈震威,等. 油气输送管道动火的作业方法[J]. 广州化工,2014,42(19):240-242. SONG Shengkui, ZHANG Yong, CHEN Zhenwei, et al. The operation method of hot oil and gas pipelines [J]. Guangzhou Chemical Industry, 2014, 42(19): 240-242.
[10]Q/SY 64-2012 油气管道动火规范[S].2012.
[11]SY/T 5858-2004 石油工业动火作业安全规程[S].2004.
[12]杨凯,王寿全,范映冲,等. 煤与瓦斯突出危险性的未知权重多属性综合评价模型[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(10): 33-38. YANG Kai, WANG Shouquan, FAN Yingchong, et al. Unknown weight multiple attribute model for evaluating risk of coal and gas outburst [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2013, 9(10): 33-38.
[13]刘开第,庞彦军,孙光勇,等. 城市环境质量的未确知测度评价[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,1999,19(12):52-58. LIU Kaidi, PANG Yanjun, SUN Guangyong, et al. The unascertained measurement evaluation on a city's environmental quality [J]. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, 1999, 19(12): 52-58.
[14]Q/SY 1238-2009 工作前安全分析管理规范[S].2009.

相似文献/References:

[1]周立国,姚安林,蒋宏业,等.城镇燃气管道第三方施工损伤风险评价方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(12):123.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.12.019]
 ZHOU Li-guo,YAO An-lin,JIANG Hong-ye,et al.Research on risk assessment method of third-party construction damage for urban gas pipeline[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(1):123.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.12.019]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-03-01