|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]徐吉辉,姜帆,张亮.基于SEFA的现役装备改进风险评价指标体系研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(3):53.
 XU Ji hui,JIANG Fan,ZHANG Liang.Research on evaluation index system of active equipment improvement risk[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(3):53.
点击复制

基于SEFA的现役装备改进风险评价指标体系研究
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
8
期数:
2012年3期
页码:
53
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2012-03-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on evaluation index system of active equipment improvement risk 
作者:
徐吉辉姜帆张亮
(空军工程大学 工程学院, 西安 710038)
Author(s):
XU JihuiJIANG FanZHANG Liang
(The Engineering Institute, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710038, China)
关键词:
现役装备改进风险评价结构熵结构优化因子分析
Keywords:
active equipment improvement risk evaluation structure entropy structure optimizationfactor analysis
分类号:
X949
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
现役装备改进是在原有产品基础上,通过采用各种改进措施,对产品的战术技术性能和结构进行局部改善,以达到提高或改进装备性能,延长装备使用寿命的目的。现役装备改进是一个复杂的系统工程过程,制约因素多、技术难度大,风险在所难免。为确保改进任务顺利进行,必须及时开展风险分析和评价研究,从而预先采取针对性措施加以防范。研究分析了现役装备改进的风险因子,构建了风险评价指标体系,并运用结构熵理论对指标体系的结构有序度进行了评价,提出了相对优化方案。最后,运用因子分析方法(FA)对构建的指标体系进行了因子分析,验证了指标体系的合理性。
Abstract:
Active equipment improvement is based on the foundation of the primary product,by the diversified measures of improvement,the tactics performance and structure of the product received partial improvement,to obtain the aim of enhancing or improving equipment performance and extending the uselifetime. Active equipment improvement is a complicated system engineering process,the restrict factors, technical difficulty and the risk are unavoidable. To ensure the improvement task go on wheels, so the risk analysis and evaluation are necessarily developing on time, and adopts the pertinent measures keep away in advance. Research on the active equipment improvement risk factors was conducted, the risk evaluation index system was established and the structure entropy theory was applied to evaluate the sequence of the index system and the comparatively optimum scheme was put forward. Finally, the factor analysis method was applied to analyze the index system, which confirmed the rationality of the index system.

参考文献/References:

-

相似文献/References:

[1]张晓,张钢.船上劳动安全风险辨识研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(3):161.
 ZHANG Xiao,ZHANG Gang.A study on risk identification of shipboard working safety[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(3):161.
[2]许红军,田俊改.支线机场安全动态预警技术研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(5):123.
 XU Hong-jun,TIAN Jun-gai.Dynamic hazard identification and evaluation techniques for regional airport safety and security[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(3):123.
[3]高旭,张圣柱,杨国梁,等.风险沟通研究进展综述[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(5):148.
 GAO Xu,ZHANG Sheng-zhu,YANG Guo-liang,et al.Overview on reseach status of risk communication[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(3):148.
[4]倪红兵.运用危险源控制方法改进职业健康安全管理的有效性[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):187.
 Ni Hong-bing.Thorough Using the Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment method to Continual Improvement the Effectiveness of Occupational Health and Safety Management[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(3):187.
[5]王长建,陈刚.风险因子模糊评价法在钻机安全评价中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(9):149.
 WANG Chang-jian,CHEN Gang.The Applications of Risk Factor Fuzzy Evaluation Method(RFEM)to Risk Assessment of Drilling Rig[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(3):149.
[6]石荣,李明捷.变权综合法在航空公司风险评价中的应用研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(10):143.
 SHI Rong,LI Ming-jie.Application of variable weight synthetic evaluation method in safety assessment of SMS of civil aviation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(3):143.
[7]巫志鹏,白永忠,林景喜.新化工装置风险评价方法的研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(10):154.
 WU Zhi-peng,BAI Yong-zhong,LIN Jing-xi.Study on the methods of hazard risk assessment for new facilities[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(3):154.
[8]张蒙,冯福亮.成品油库临时性常规作业管理现状分析及改进措施[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(11):216.
 ZHANG Meng,FENG Fu liang.Present situation analysis and improvement measurement for management of the occasional conventional operation in oil tankfarm[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(3):216.
[9]汪长永,杨卫,殷焕召,等.模糊综合评价法在油气管道跨越工程风险评价中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(3):143.
 WANG Chang-yong,YANG Wei,YIN Huan-zhao,et al.Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation in risk evaluation of pipeline crossing engineering[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(3):143.
[10]王文和,易俊,沈士明.基于风险的城市埋地燃气管道安全评价模型及应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(3):163.
 WANG Wen-he,YI Jun,SHEN Shi-ming.Safety evaluation model and application for the urban buried gas pipeline based on risk[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(3):163.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
空军工程大学“以天强空”军事理论创新基金项目(空军现役主战航空装备升级改造对策研究)
更新日期/Last Update: 2012-04-27