|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]罗珊,蒋宏业,姚安林,等.输气管道隧道的脆弱性评估方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(2):113-117.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2016.02.020]
　LUO Shan,JIANG Hongye,YAO Anlin,et al.Research on vulnerability assessment method of tunnel for natural gas pipeline[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(2):113-117.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2016.02.020]
点击复制

输气管道隧道的脆弱性评估方法研究
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
12
期数:
2016年2期
页码:
113-117
栏目:
现代职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2016-02-29

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on vulnerability assessment method of tunnel for natural gas pipeline
文章编号:
1673-193X(2016)-02-0113-05
作者:
罗珊; 蒋宏业; 姚安林; 江文; 曾跃辉
西南石油大学 石油与天然气工程学院，四川 成都 610500
Author(s):
LUO Shan;  JIANG Hongye;  YAO Anlin;  JIANG Wen;  ZENG Yuehui
College of Petroleum & Natural Gas Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu Sichuan 610500, China
关键词:
隧道; 脆弱性; AGA-AHP; 组合权重; 对比评估
Keywords:
tunnel;  vulnerability;  AGA-AHP;  combined weights;  contrast evaluation
分类号:
X913.4
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2016.02.020
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为研究输气管道隧道的脆弱性，结合工程和实践研究，建立管道本体致灾因子、隧道本体致灾因子、人为致灾因子和环境致灾因子4个方面共16个底层因素的指标体系。采用加速遗传算法改进的层次分析法（AGA-AHP）计算脆弱性级别权重和样本集权重。对于脆弱性级别权重边界突变的问题，用拟合曲线的方法来解决。运用组合权重与模糊综合评价法相结合的方法，按照不同隶属原则分别对系统整体和各子系统的脆弱性进行对比评估。实例分析结果表明，该输气管道隧道表现为中脆弱性，管道公司应及时采取有效措施整治和改善。
Abstract:
In order to study the vulnerability of tunnel for natural gas pipeline, an index system including 16 bottom factors in 4 aspects was established by combined engineering and practice research. The vulnerability level weights and sample set weights were calculated by analytic hierarchy process method, which was improved by accelerating genetic algorithm (AGA-AHP). The problem of sudden change in boundary of vulnerability level weights was solved by fitting curve. By using the combined method of combined weights and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, the contrast evaluation on vulnerability of overall system and each subsystem was conducted according to the different subjection principle. The case analysis results showed that the vulnerability of this tunnel for natural gas pipe was moderate, so the pipeline enterprise should take effective measures to renovate and improve it in time.

参考文献/References:

［1］黄亮亮,姚安林,鲜涛,等.考虑脆弱性的油气管道风险评价方法研究［J］.中国安全科学学报,2014,24(7):93-99. HUANG LiangLiang, YAO Anlin, XIAN Tao, et al. Research on risk assessment method of oil & gas pipeline with consideration of vulnerability［J］.China Safety Science Journal, 2014,24(7):93-99.
［2］杨光,刘敦文等.基于云模型的隧道塌方风险等级评价［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(6):95-101. YANG Guang, LIU Dunwen, CHU Fujiao, et al. Evaluation on risk grade of tunnel collapse based on cloud model［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2015,11(6):95-101.
［3］吴方靖.隧道施工中的危险与有害因素辨识及防护［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2007,3(6):138-141. WU Fangjing. The identification and protection of risk and hazard factors in construction of tunnel［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2007,3(6):138-141.
［4］吴晓南,鲜燕,黄坤,等.运行工况下隧道内输气管道的应力分析［J］.油气储运,2012,31(12):927-930. WU Xiaonan, XIAN Yan, HUANG Kun, et al. Stress analysis of gas pipeline under the condition of operation in the tunnel ［J］.Oil & gas storage and transportation, 2012,31(12):927-930.
［5］Satty T L, Vargas L G. Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process［J］.European Journal of Operational Research, 1987,32(1):107-117.
［6］金菊良,黄慧梅,魏一鸣.基于组合权重的水质评价模型［J］.水力发电学报,2004,23(7):14-19. JIN Juliang, HUANG Huimei, WEI Yiming. Comprehensive evaluation model for water quality based on combined weights［J］. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2004,23(7):14-19.
［7］金菊良,魏一鸣.复杂系统广义智能评价方法与应用［M］.北京:科学出版社,2008.
［8］付娟,金菊良,等.基于集对分析动态组合权重的水资源脆弱性评价模型［C］.非传统安全与集对分析会议,2009:98-106.
［9］鲜涛,姚安林,李熠辰,等.基于属性识别理论的油气管道施工质量风险评价［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(4):95-101. XIAN Tao, YAO Anlin, LI Yichen, et, al. Risk assessment on constructing quality of oil & gas pipeline based on attribute recognition theory ［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2015,11(4):95-101.
［10］张丽,柏萍,汪忠雨,等.基于层次分析与模糊综合评价的事故应急预案评估［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(9):126-131. ZHANG Li, BAI Ping, WANG Zhongyu, et, al. Assessment of accident emergency plan based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation ［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2015,11(9):126-131.
［11］王化中,强凤娇, 陈晓暾,等.模糊综合评价中权重与评价原则的重新确定［J］.统计与决策,2015,11(8):24-27. WANG Huazhong, QIANG Fengjiao, CHEN Xiaotun, et al. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation to determine weights and evaluation principles［J］. Statistics and Decision, 2015,11(8):24-27.
［12］魏兴萍,蒲俊兵,赵纯勇.基于修正RISKE模型的重庆岩溶地区地下水脆弱性评价［J］.生态学报,2014,34(3):589-596. WEI Xingping, PU Junbing, ZHAO Chunyong. Assessment of karst groundwater vulnerability in Chongqing based on revised RISKE model［J］. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014,34(3):589-596.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘铁民.事故灾难成因再认识——脆弱性研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(5):5.
　LIU Tie-min.Recognition of disaster causes—study of the vulnerability[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(2):5.
[2]刘铁民.火灾频发暴露我国城市公共安全系统脆弱性[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(3):5.
　LIU Tie-min.The frequent fire accidents exposed the vulnerability of urban public safety system[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(2):5.
[3]杨小玉.隧道二次衬砌与初期支护间脱空原因分析及处理[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(2):140.
　YANG Xiao yu.Cause analysis and treatment scheme of the separation between the secondary liner and primary support of tunnel[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(2):140.
[4]王汉斌,高翔.煤矿企业脆弱性评估的AHPRS组合权重法[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(3):170.
　WANG Han bing,GAO Xiang.Vulnerability assessment of coal mine enterprise with the method of ascertaining weight based on analytic hierarchy process and rough set[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(2):170.
[5]李岳,戴俊,顾寅,等.大变形隧道长短锚杆支护机理及设计应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(5):11.
　LI Yue,DAI Jun,GU Yin,et al.Support mechanism and parameter design applications of long and short anchor in large deformation tunnel[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(2):11.
[6]史聪灵 ,钟茂华,何理,等.地铁车站及隧道全尺寸火灾实验研究（1）－实验设计[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(6):22.
　SHI Cong ling,ZHONG Mao hua,HE Li,et al.Investigation of fullscale fire experiments in metro station and tunnel (1) —experimental setup[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(2):22.
[7]张靖岩,王婉娣,彭伟,等.纵向风速对隧道内烟气发展影响的实验研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(1):17.
　ZHANG Jing-yan,WANG Wan-di,PENG Wei,et al.Experimental study on the effect of longitudinal ventilation on smoke development in tunnels[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(2):17.
[8]刘铁民,徐永莉,王浩.重特大事故频发凸显生产安全的系统脆弱性——2013年几起特大事故反思[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(4):5.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.04.001]
　LIU Tie-min,XU Yong-li,WANG Hao.The frequent serious accidents exposing the system vulnerability of work safety——Reflection on several serious accidents in 2013[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(2):5.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.04.001]
[9]梅国栋,王云海.三维流固耦合数值模拟在铜锣山隧道安全性评价中的应用*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2009,5(6):57.
　MEI Guo dong,WANG Yun hai.The application of 3D fluidsolid coupling numerical simulation in the safety accessment of TongLuo Shan tunnel[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2009,5(2):57.
[10]门永生,于振,朱朝阳,等.基于PSR模型的电网基础设施脆弱性评估方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(8):169.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.08.030]
　MEN Yong-sheng,YU Zhen,ZHU Chao-yang,et al.Research on vulnerability assessment method of power grid infrastructures based on PSR model[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(2):169.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.08.030]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家“十二五”科技支撑计划项目（2011BAK06B01-11-01）
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-03-11